Exercise 6: Active Testing of Stereotypes/Active Learning about the Poor
Including two simulations (see below).
Goal: Testing the veracity of the welfare recipient/poor people stereotypes elicited in the Stereotype exercise, or through other means.
Directions: Divide the class into two groups: the working poor and welfare recipients. Give each student one of the two simulations on the following pages to do and to discuss as a group later on in class.
Debrief: Ask each group to meet as a group first, and share their experiences with each other. Then ask representatives of each group to come forward, describe their assignment, and report on their own group’s problems in living under the conditions described in their assignment.
Questions:
- How hard would it be to be part of the working poor?
- What solutions, if any, did you find to your problems?
- What barriers exist that would prevent getting out of poverty?
- How hard was it to be on a welfare budget?
- What solutions, if any, do you think you could use to improve your lot?
- Which of the two groups was better off?
- Were the realities for each group about what you would have guessed, better than you would have guessed, or worse than you would have guessed? Why?
- Were the realities of living on welfare anything like what is advertised in the media? If not, then why do you think the picture of life on welfare is so distorted?
Simulation A: Becoming One of the Working Poor
It is the year 2000. Pretend that you have graduated from High School, cannot go on to college due to lack of money, and have married your high school sweetheart. You also have one child, six weeks old. While your spouse takes care of the baby, you work at the only job you could find, at McDonald’s, for minimum wage. Like most part-time workers, you average 29 hours of work per week over the year. Lucky for you there is the new minimum wage law so you make $5.25 an hour, although that still isn’t much after taxes.
Simulation B: Becoming a Welfare Recipient
Imagine that you are a single parent, divorced, with two children (ages 2 and 5 years old). With no work history to fall back on after your husband left you, and given the cost of child care for two children, you thought it would be better for your kids if you lived off welfare, just until they are old enough to be in school during the day. You apply for aid, and discover that, because you earned less than $2000 last year, and your car is so old that its value was not counted against you, you will be receiving the most monthly TANF funds for a family of three allowed in Alabama (before the “welfare reform”) in the amount of $164 a month, $341 in food stamps a month, and Medicaid benefits.
